Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 26, 2023. It is now read-only.

Missing things (before deprecation of BioSeq.jl) #55

Closed
3 of 6 tasks
diegozea opened this issue May 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Closed
3 of 6 tasks

Missing things (before deprecation of BioSeq.jl) #55

diegozea opened this issue May 27, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@diegozea
Copy link
Member

diegozea commented May 27, 2015

List of things that need to be present on Bio.jl before deprecation of BioSeq.jl

Important:

  • Gap representation and gapped sequences; replace BioSeq's aminoacid('-')
  • Alignment representations: in order to replace BioSeq's Array{AminoAcid,2}

Optional:

  • Matching functions (search, replace and others):
    • IUPAC Regex
    • PROSITE patterns
  • 8-bit Bit-Level Coding Scheme for Nucleotides
@diegozea diegozea changed the title Bio.Seq and BioSeq interaction Missing things (before deprecation of BioSeq.jl) May 27, 2015
@TransGirlCodes
Copy link
Member

I think we can tick off Gap and Alignment on this list - We've been working on Alignment representations and gapped sequences in the Align module, and a lot of it has been merged and will now continue to improve.

@bicycle1885
Copy link
Member

I've created a new issue about coding scheme for nucleotides: #122.

@TransGirlCodes
Copy link
Member

I don't know if newseq branch has PROSITE patterns or IUPAC regex off the top of my head. But merging of the newest branch should more or less complete the depreciation of BioSeq.jl

@diegozea
Copy link
Member Author

I not into the new changes, but looks like there were big advances :D I could try to port the missing regex functionality into Bio.Seq, and making it compatible with the new sequences in the future.

@TransGirlCodes
Copy link
Member

Is this now closable? I believe @bicycle1885 implemented pattern matching and so on as part of SoC.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants