New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
icetea #719
Comments
Hi @vivekbhr Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:
|
A reviewer has been assigned to your package Learn what to expect IMPORTANT: Please read the instructions for setting |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. Congratulations! The package built without errors or warnings Please see the build report for more details. |
Sorry for the delay on this. I'll get you a review tomorrow. |
Hi, I've done a first review. Please see comments / suggestions below and let me know if you have any questions.
I don't see where you define what icetea stands for. While the letters may stand for 'integrating cap enrichment transcript expression analsyis' I doubt that will be immediately obvious to anyone. I would suggest putting this in 'Description' of DESCRIPTION and the vignette. It's good you have several biocViews so at least it will be categorized and hopefully users will have an idea of what the package does.
You don't have to create man pages for functions that you do not export. If you do create them, they should be complete. For example, ResizeReads is not exported but the man page has several problems:
All this function does is call GenomicRanges::resize. Do you really need a separate function for this?
Please revisit the non-exported functions and decide if they are worth keeping. If they are, add detail to the man pages.
Why not re-use FastaFile or FastaFileList as input and SummarizedExperiment or as output? If you are set on creating your own S4 class it should extend RangedSummarizedExperiment.
A package in 'imports' in DESCRIPTION should be fully or selectively imported in NAMESPACE. For example, these packages are in 'imports' but not mentioned in NAMESPACE.
This is not a comprehensive list. Please go through DESCRIPTION and check the packages against NAMESPACE.
I would recommend renaming the R files to match the function name and man page. For example, detect_TSS.R -> detectRSS.R.
|
Thanks for the review Valerie. I would try to fix them soon |
@vobencha Thanks for the review. Here are some changes I made so far : package name I modified the description to add what icetea stands for. (Integrating Cap Enrichment with Transcript Expression Analysis) Please remove LazyData = true. DONE non-exported functions I improved description of ResizeReads and other non-exported functions. I don't need the man pages but I would like to keep the roxygen style comments in the code so I end up generating them. I want to keep the function newCapSet class The purpose in my mind when creating the class was to use a container for all file paths (fastq and BAMs) along with mapping statistics, also to make it easy to check certain assumptions and fail early in the analysis. I tried using imports / exports R file names DONE |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Received a valid push; starting a build. Commits are: 68579bf fixed issues with bioparallel |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "skipped, ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on Linux, Mac, and Windows. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "ERROR". Please see the build report for more details. |
@vobencha I have fixed all issues with the build errors except the error with RSubread on windows. Please have a look at my replies above and let me know if additional changes are required. Best, |
Thanks for making the changes. If you want to keep RSubread in Suggests you'll need to add a .BBSoptions file as described by Herve in Valerie |
@vobencha It's there already. It's just not being recognized by the build system at the moment. |
Yes, I know the SPB does not recognize this option and the error will persist until the package is built on the formal build system. I had missed the file in the github repo when I looked for it last time. Thanks for adding it. |
Your package has been accepted. It will be added to the Thank you for contributing to Bioconductor! |
The master branch of your GitHub repository has been added to Bioconductor's git repository. To use the git.bioconductor.org repository, we need an 'ssh' key to associate with your github user name. If your GitHub account already has ssh public keys (https://github.com/vivekbhr.keys is not empty), then no further steps are required. Otherwise, do the following: See further instructions at https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/ for working with this repository. See especially https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/new-package-workflow/ to keep your GitHub and Bioconductor repositories in sync. Your package will be included in the next nigthly 'devel' build (check-out from git at about 6 pm Eastern; build completion around 2pm Eastern the next day) at https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/ (Builds sometimes fail, so ensure that the date stamps on the main landing page are consistent with the addition of your package). Once the package builds successfully, you package will be available for download in the 'Devel' version of Bioconductor using https://bioconductor.org/packages/icetea If you have any questions, please contact the bioc-devel mailing list (https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel); this issue will not be monitored further. |
Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of
the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor
Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'
I understand that by submitting my package to Bioconductor,
the package source and all review commentary are visible to the
general public.
I have read the Bioconductor Package Submission
instructions. My package is consistent with the Bioconductor
Package Guidelines.
I understand that a minimum requirement for package acceptance
is to pass R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck with no ERROR or WARNINGS.
Passing these checks does not result in automatic acceptance. The
package will then undergo a formal review and recommendations for
acceptance regarding other Bioconductor standards will be addressed.
My package addresses statistical or bioinformatic issues related
to the analysis and comprehension of high throughput genomic data.
I am committed to the long-term maintenance of my package. This
includes monitoring the support site for issues that users may
have, subscribing to the bioc-devel mailing list to stay aware
of developments in the Bioconductor community, responding promptly
to requests for updates from the Core team in response to changes in
R or underlying software.
I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software
management, including:
months, for bug fixes.
(optionally via GitHub).
For help with submitting your package, please subscribe and post questions
to the bioc-devel mailing list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: