Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vesting contract #24

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 22, 2017
Merged

Vesting contract #24

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 22, 2017

Conversation

Janther
Copy link

@Janther Janther commented Nov 22, 2017

A vesting contract that complies with the following rules given proper constructor params:

  • Advisors:
    • 25m POLY
    • vested until August 23rd, 2018
    • we specify numbers/addresses
  • Founders:
    • 150m POLY
    • 1/4th vested until 1 year cliff
    • with 1/48th vest every month thereafter
    • allocated to multiple addresses that we specify.
  • Reserve:
    • 450m POLY
    • vested until April 18th, 2018
    • with 10m POLY released every month
    • sent to a single address

Also update on compiler and truffle version.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 83.7% when pulling f150ccd on vesting_contract into cb3b2b6 on master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.8%) to 83.7% when pulling f150ccd on vesting_contract into cb3b2b6 on master.

Copy link

@OperationNine OperationNine left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

modifier "restricted" could be renamed to onlyOwner in Migrations.sol for consistency but otherwise fine 👍

@salis salis merged commit 9e48026 into master Nov 22, 2017
Copy link

@matt-lough matt-lough left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants