-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Presentation
Brian Pho edited this page Mar 15, 2022
·
3 revisions
- Don't use script
- Graphics are good
- Explain figures more
- Have funding agencies on acknowledgments slide
- Don't mumble and speak too softly
- Analogy between intelligence and exercise was good
- Explain justification for age bins (based on literature)
- Perfectly timed talk, nice summary at end, excellent use of visuals and transition phrases
- Don't apologize
- Clarify age bins
- Age is a continuous -> Creating groups -> Saying they're distinct
- Why those bins? Cite Baum paper
- By using age bins, we can't tease out development
- Distinct age models -> Distinct brain patterns
- Why can't we predict TD? why can't we predict bin 3?
- Maybe the bias comes from the way HBN collects the data (asked for parents that suspect have issues with their child)
- State what the red and blue connections are
- Redo FC glass brain so nodes colored according to Power atlas
- Go over HBN in more detail (how long ago, how it was collected)
- Slide on why movies (naturalistic)
- Move literature slides to before the gap slide
- Describe everything about a figure (E.g. Functional connectivity, red=pos, blue=neg)
- Don't say we picked Ridge because it's "better", say we pick Ridge bc more computationally efficient
- Say we picked Ridge after presenting both (so not cherry picking)
- For CP, don't mention "moving down WISC"
- Lump all of the reasons together (why intelligence, why adhd, why development)
- Don't put pursuit of knowledge for its own sake
- remove perm testing slide