Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support python310 pipe unions. #80

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Support python310 pipe unions. #80

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

BrianPugh
Copy link
Owner

Addresses #77

@BrianPugh
Copy link
Owner Author

@samsja can you give this a try and see if it resolves the bug you found?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (0e62cf5) 95.80% compared to head (d743310) 95.81%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #80      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.80%   95.81%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines        1667     1672       +5     
  Branches      415      416       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1597     1602       +5     
  Misses         34       34              
  Partials       36       36              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.69% <85.71%> (-0.05%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@BrianPugh BrianPugh merged commit f0a1bc4 into main Jan 17, 2024
15 checks passed
@BrianPugh BrianPugh deleted the python310-unions branch January 17, 2024 22:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants