Change LICENSE from MIT to ISC #68
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Merged
maxime4000
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2023
|
thanks @justindhillon ! |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
hirsaeki
pushed a commit
to hirsaeki/gpt-crawler-y-upstream
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 27, 2024
Change LICENSE from MIT to ISC
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When we created the LICENSE file in #18 , we did not consider that the package.json file already stated that the license was ISC. This was brought up by maxime4000. So either we change the package.json license to MIT, or we change the LICENSE file to ISC. In this pull request, to align with the original goals of the project, I changed the LICENSE file to ISC.
Here is a Wikipedia article about the ISC lisense