Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Onyx port after upgrade #367

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 9, 2021
Merged

Conversation

apcraig
Copy link
Contributor

@apcraig apcraig commented Jul 9, 2021

PR checklist

  • Short (1 sentence) summary of your PR:
    Update Onyx port after system upgrade
  • Developer(s):
    apcraig
  • Suggest PR reviewers from list in the column to the right.
  • Please copy the PR test results link or provide a summary of testing completed below.
    All tests pass on Onyx, some answers change on Onyx but only due to new compiler versions. https://github.com/CICE-Consortium/Test-Results/wiki/icepack_by_hash_forks#a80472b547aa6d7a85f8ae5e1449273a323e0371
  • How much do the PR code changes differ from the unmodified code?
    • bit for bit, except Onyx
    • different at roundoff level
    • more substantial
  • Does this PR create or have dependencies on CICE or any other models?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Does this PR add any new test cases?
    • Yes
    • No
  • Is the documentation being updated? ("Documentation" includes information on the wiki or in the .rst files from doc/source/, which are used to create the online technical docs at https://readthedocs.org/projects/cice-consortium-cice/.)
    • Yes
    • No, does the documentation need to be updated at a later time?
      • Yes
      • No
  • Please provide any additional information or relevant details below:

Update intel, gnu, cray compiler versions after major system upgrade.

@apcraig apcraig merged commit 583d961 into CICE-Consortium:master Jul 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants