[V1.3] Contacts: Added findphone, findname and findaddress commands

[T0roloco]

No description provided.

[QzSG]

@T0roloco Mind resolving the conflict? Not sure which one is the correct one u need

[T0roloco]

@T0roloco Mind resolving the conflict? Not sure which one is the correct one u need

@QzSG Hmm...strange. For some reason I don't have the line:

         commandList.add(FindCommand.COMMAND_WORD + " KEYWORD");

in my version of main. Not really what that line does, not sure what do do here. Should I try to update my version of main and just copy the classes I've created? I haven't done tests for those classes yet, but the commands I added work as intended

[T0roloco]

Btw I'm pretty sure the FindCommand class can be deleted since i added the other commands. I just decided not to since I'm thinking of creating a superclass and make the other three subclasses

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 117

• 3 of 54 (5.56%) changed or added relevant lines in 8 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-1.7%) to 70.527%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/parser/AddressBookParser.java	0	3	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/parser/FindAddressCommandParser.java	0	7	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/parser/FindNameCommandParser.java	0	7	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/parser/FindPhoneCommandParser.java	0	7	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/commands/FindAddressCommand.java	0	9	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/commands/FindNameCommand.java	0	9	0.0%
src/main/java/seedu/address/logic/commands/FindPhoneCommand.java	0	9	0.0%

Totals
Change from base Build 116:	-1.7%
Covered Lines:	1498
Relevant Lines:	2124

---

💛 - Coveralls

[QzSG]

Looks good for now. Would be nice to add some unit tests in future pull requests so that we can be sure adding these commands did not break the others (also that it works as expected).

Some of the predicate methods look similar, once you are done with everything else and if there is time maybe you could look into making them more generic, for now its okay!

(Bypassing strict checks since Github outage stops webhooks from being sent so travis could not run build & tests but AppVeyor passed)

[QzSG]

Relevant #63