Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build for target architecture ARM64/aarch64 #62

Closed
emk2203 opened this issue Aug 12, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #63
Closed

Build for target architecture ARM64/aarch64 #62

emk2203 opened this issue Aug 12, 2023 · 4 comments · Fixed by #63

Comments

@emk2203
Copy link

emk2203 commented Aug 12, 2023

If possible and not too much work, please supply a build for the ARM64/aarch64 architecture as well. The armv7-unknown-linux-gnueabihf binary doesn't work here, it errors out with -bash: ./dysk: cannot execute: required file not found.

Future ARM generations will be more and more ARM64, so the support of it will be future-proof.
`

@emk2203 emk2203 changed the title Build for target architecture ARM64 Build for target architecture ARM64/aarch64 Aug 18, 2023
Canop added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 18, 2023
@Canop
Copy link
Owner

Canop commented Aug 18, 2023

Can you check #63 looks right ?

@emk2203
Copy link
Author

emk2203 commented Aug 18, 2023

I looked at the compile-all-targets.sh and this looked good. Waiting for the release to see if everything is OK. I can test it on two different systems, so it should work for everyone if it works for me.

@Canop Canop closed this as completed in #63 Aug 20, 2023
@Canop
Copy link
Owner

Canop commented Aug 20, 2023

I should merge #64 soon, then make a release with all those binaries

@emk2203
Copy link
Author

emk2203 commented Aug 25, 2023

I can confirm that the aarch64 version works at least with two different chips (Amlogic S905X3 and Rockchip RK3568B2).

Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants