Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding analysis quota #8872

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jul 20, 2016
Merged

Adding analysis quota #8872

merged 22 commits into from
Jul 20, 2016

Conversation

xavijam
Copy link
Contributor

@xavijam xavijam commented Jul 14, 2016

Implements the quota analysis block for each analysis that needs non-free services, as in buffer or trade-areas.

screen shot 2016-07-14 at 15 53 22

CR: @nobuti
Fixes #8766.

@xavijam
Copy link
Contributor Author

xavijam commented Jul 14, 2016

So this implements the quota element for analysis confirm, but it opens the 🍉 about how to know if the analysis is using one provider or other, or if it uses a paid service or not. Already discussed with @rafatower but I feel we need to discuss it at length.
cc @saleiva @javisantana @rochoa

@xavijam
Copy link
Contributor Author

xavijam commented Jul 19, 2016

Let's merge it although it is not decided yet how to manage this problem.
Could you take a look @nobuti? Although I'm finishing my pending tests, the idea is there 💋

.Infobox {
@include flex(10);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

10?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No idea why I wrote 10, with 2 would be enough.

@@ -403,15 +403,15 @@
"body": "<span class='CDB-Text is-semibold'>Your map is private</span>. Change your <a href='#'' class='js-change-privacy'>privacy settings</a> to embed your map. Right now it's private."
}
},
"cartodbjs": {
"title": "CartoDB.js",
"CARTOjs": {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

har, fixing it

@rafatower
Copy link
Contributor

@ethervoid another bit to take into account for quota requirements... this is turning a lot of fun

@xavijam
Copy link
Contributor Author

xavijam commented Jul 19, 2016

Added some specs and removed all content not related with this Pull request @nobuti 💋

@xavijam xavijam merged commit 808e205 into master Jul 20, 2016
@xavijam xavijam deleted the issue-8766 branch July 20, 2016 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants