Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to exclude fields/records #3

Open
ChuckJonas opened this issue Nov 17, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Ability to exclude fields/records #3

ChuckJonas opened this issue Nov 17, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@ChuckJonas
Copy link
Owner

Add additional optional configuration to exclude fields and possibly children records (EG where clause). Currently this can be done by just nulling/removing them from the clone SObject instance property

@ChuckJonas
Copy link
Owner Author

ChuckJonas commented Nov 17, 2018

Correction: there doesn't appear to be any mutate the children on a generic SObject, so I don't removing a child from the returned result set currently is possible.

One solution would be to expose a Map<string, SObject[]> which contained the children that will be updated (key is relationshipname)

ChuckJonas added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2018
workaround for #3
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant