Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a "glossary" system for term management #39

Open
terotik opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Add a "glossary" system for term management #39

terotik opened this issue Oct 28, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@terotik
Copy link
Contributor

terotik commented Oct 28, 2016

  • add a model for Term Categories (these group Terms, below)
  • add a model for Term (has a reference to a Category, a name, a rich text (HTML) description, and a "show in lists" boolean field)
  • add admin for the above
  • make it possible to refer to Terms from within HTML content (Make special terms hoverable #7)
  • make it possible to add a Wagtail Block that lists all list-visible terms in a given Category ("definition list") (Add definition list element to content editor #37)
@terotik
Copy link
Contributor Author

terotik commented Nov 1, 2016

#7 related to this

@akx akx added the ready label Nov 1, 2016
@akx akx changed the title Make re-usable content snippets embeddable in page content Add a "glossary" system for term management Nov 2, 2016
@akx akx added in progress and removed ready labels Nov 2, 2016
akx added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2016
akx added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 7, 2016
Not currently enabled for any field though!

Refs #39

Refs #37
@akx akx removed their assignment May 28, 2021
@akx
Copy link
Contributor

akx commented May 28, 2021

I unassigned myself because I'm not quite involved with this project anymore. It's unfortunate that Glossy apparently never got merged.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants