Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

-Wparentheses in drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c #1971

Closed
nathanchance opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

-Wparentheses in drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c #1971

nathanchance opened this issue Dec 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
@nathanchance
Labels
-Wparentheses [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle

Comments

@nathanchance
Copy link
Member 

  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: error: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Werror,-Wparentheses]
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                             (                                                   )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                                                                      (
    758 |                                                               xt->sgl[i].size : 0;
        |
        |                                                                                  )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: error: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Werror,-Wparentheses]
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                             (                                                   )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                                                                      (
    760 |                                                               xt->sgl[i].size : 0;
        |
        |                                                                                  )

Patch submitted: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231222-dma-xilinx-xdma-clang-fixes-v1-1-84a18ff184d2@kernel.org/
@nathanchance nathanchance added [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next -Wparentheses labels Dec 22, 2023
@nathanchance nathanchance self-assigned this Dec 22, 2023
torvalds pushed a commit to torvalds/linux that referenced this issue Jan 20, 2024
@nathanchance @vinodkoul
dmaengine: xilinx: xdma: Fix operator precedence in xdma_prep_interle…
fe0d495 
…aved_dma()

Clang warns (or errors with CONFIG_WERROR=y):

  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: error: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Werror,-Wparentheses]
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                             (                                                   )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:757:68: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
    757 |                 src_addr += dmaengine_get_src_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->src_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                                                                      (
    758 |                                                               xt->sgl[i].size : 0;
        |
        |                                                                                  )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: error: operator '?:' has lower precedence than '+'; '+' will be evaluated first [-Werror,-Wparentheses]
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: note: place parentheses around the '+' expression to silence this warning
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                             (                                                   )
  drivers/dma/xilinx/xdma.c:759:68: note: place parentheses around the '?:' expression to evaluate it first
    759 |                 dst_addr += dmaengine_get_dst_icg(xt, &xt->sgl[i]) + xt->dst_inc ?
        |                                                                                  ^
        |                                                                      (
    760 |                                                               xt->sgl[i].size : 0;
        |
        |                                                                                  )

The src_inc and dst_inc members of 'struct dma_interleaved_template' are
booleans, so it does not make sense for the addition to happen first.
Wrap the conditional operator in parantheses so it is evaluated first.

Closes: ClangBuiltLinux#1971
Fixes: 2f8f90c ("dmaengine: xilinx: xdma: Implement interleaved DMA transfers")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222-dma-xilinx-xdma-clang-fixes-v1-1-84a18ff184d2@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
@nathanchance
Copy link
Member Author

Merged into mainline: https://git.kernel.org/linus/fe0d495e759cee0dbfff4348b5791f21b6f56655

@nathanchance nathanchance added [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle and removed [PATCH] Submitted A patch has been submitted for review labels Jan 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nathanchance nathanchance

Labels
-Wparentheses [BUG] linux-next This is an issue only seen in linux-next [FIXED][LINUX] development cycle This bug was only present and fixed in a -next or -rc cycle
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@nathanchance