-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
adrf ontology is all wrong #3
Comments
Thank you so much for these very helpful comments. We will review and
reply to you shortly
Julia Lane
Professor, Wagner, NYU and the Coleridge Initiative
Cell phone: 646 208 4990
https://coleridgeinitiative.org
*From:* Vladimir Alexiev <notifications@github.com>
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:04 AM
*To:* Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto <adrf-onto@noreply.github.com>
*Cc:* Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
*Subject:* [Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto] this ontology is all wrong (#3)
- You can't just graft classes from different ontologies, instantiate
them and put them into a SKOS concept scheme
- Eg when you say :Dataset a dcat:Dataset, it means that :Dataset is one
particular dataset. This cannot be owl:sameAs dbr:Data_set because
that's (arguably) the *concept* of a Dataset.
- prefix : is missing, so it seems to me
https://github.com/Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto/blob/master/adrf.ttl
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_Coleridge-2DInitiative_adrf-2Donto_blob_master_adrf.ttl&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=iw0CoAMhezvqaI9d2O1SHWSmJPvEQ6aHD2oc064_QhA&s=tmZbX7lsRBiZgd6d23HUnswmHxPPf3H5Yxaw4BmlAyM&e=>
is invalid
- https://github.com/Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto/wiki/Vocabulary
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_Coleridge-2DInitiative_adrf-2Donto_wiki_Vocabulary&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=iw0CoAMhezvqaI9d2O1SHWSmJPvEQ6aHD2oc064_QhA&s=YhnhYAR53usl9O5SBRQiwHGZZ6jsQ3vpSvFfIzBbLPw&e=>
says "subclassed from" but a (rdf:type) is not subclassing, that's
instantiation
- It says "Corpus Subclassed from SKOS:Collection" (even though that's
missing from the actual ontology), but skos:Collection has a specific use
(ad-hoc collection of Concepts), whereas Corpus is a collection of
documents (texts), so you can't do that
- you have two different definitions of :Topic. One is tied to LCSH,
which is wrong
It seems to me you are in dire need of some ontology consulting, by someone
who knows ontologies for describing:
- machine learning and data science (there are at least 8 I know of)
- datasets (DCAT2 and ADMS are the most important)
- corpora and NLP (NIF and friends)
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_Coleridge-2DInitiative_adrf-2Donto_issues_3&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=iw0CoAMhezvqaI9d2O1SHWSmJPvEQ6aHD2oc064_QhA&s=cPEXYk00RK9PzE3CpBsJWmnY_UnXJCdNEGfmMDXgxaQ&e=>,
or unsubscribe
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_notifications_unsubscribe-2Dauth_AD63AO7FQKDTRQEJBP5UKYTSJQOHDANCNFSM4SHBM4TQ&d=DwMCaQ&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=omwcNBUqPba9pikmkXZXk2bFQ7zxZPhI5OH9dd8lFDA&m=iw0CoAMhezvqaI9d2O1SHWSmJPvEQ6aHD2oc064_QhA&s=njuxlXs74m6ZxKTO_ocj6MVwjHIVmaUpkfuwf52LVko&e=>
.
|
Dear Vladimir, Thank you very much for your very helpful comments, we reviewed, and noted them for the future development. Thank you again. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
:Dataset a dcat:Dataset
, it means that:Dataset
is one particular dataset. This cannot beowl:sameAs dbr:Data_set
because that's (arguably) the concept of a Dataset.:Provider a foaf:Organization
, it means:Provider
is some specific organization. And it's doubly impossible to sayowl:sameAs dbr:Data_publishing
because publishing (providing) data is an activity, not an organization.:
is missing, so it seems to me https://github.com/Coleridge-Initiative/adrf-onto/blob/master/adrf.ttl is invalida
(rdf:type) is not subclassing, it's instantiation:Topic
. One is tied to LCSH, which is wrongIt seems to me you are in dire need of some ontology consulting, by someone who knows ontologies for describing:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: