Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow no Q2T servers to be specified on a bootstrap node #1084

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 12, 2020

Conversation

SatpalSandhu61
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #790
Add new config item "bootstrapNode" which facilitates setup of a bootstrap node with no Q2T serverConfig entries.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 11, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1084 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 96.42%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1084      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     99.41%   99.39%   -0.02%     
- Complexity     2258     2261       +3     
============================================
  Files           349      349              
  Lines          6278     6289      +11     
  Branches        358      360       +2     
============================================
+ Hits           6241     6251      +10     
  Misses            5        5              
- Partials         32       33       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
#unittests 99.39% <96.42%> (-0.02%) 2261.00 <12.00> (+3.00) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...era/config/constraints/ServerConfigsValidator.java 96.87% <95.83%> (-3.13%) 9.00 <8.00> (+2.00) ⬇️
...rc/main/java/com/quorum/tessera/config/Config.java 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) 34.00 <4.00> (+1.00)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 749c5af...a9ac54b. Read the comment docs.

@Krish1979
Copy link
Collaborator

LFTM

Krish1979
Krish1979 previously approved these changes Jun 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
0.10.6 feature User features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Do not restrict number of Q2T servers
5 participants