xruti

[solpahi]

Truncated to three places.

Definition now reads:
x1 returns to being/doing x2 (ka) from being/doing x3 (ka).

The original notes no longer fit, so we need to completely rewrite them. Should include a couple important derivations like zvaxru.

[uakci]

✔

[Ntsekees]

.i'e
Mentioning {xrugau} would also be good.

[solpahi]

Agreed about {xrugau}. And {xrukla}.

Also, I'd like to get rid of the slashes...

Since "doing" is a type of "being" (at least in the Lojban sense), the definition could probably just read:

x1 returns to being x2 (ka) from x3 (ka).

Although... is the x3 necessary?

x1 returns to being or doing x2 (ka).

And the notes need to say that {xruti} is neither agentive nor requires a volitional entity.

[uakci]

The 'returning-from' place is just as important as the 'going-from' of
klama, so I wouldn't remove it.

On Aug 16, 2016 3:15 PM, "solpahi" notifications@github.com wrote:

Agreed about {xrugau}. And {xrukla}.

Also, I'd like to get rid of the slashes...

Since "doing" is a type of "being" (at least in the Lojban sense), the
definition could probably just read:

x1 returns to being x2 (ka) from x3 (ka).

Although... is the x3 necessary?

x1 returns to being or doing x2 (ka).

And the notes need to say that {xruti} is neither agentive nor requires a
volitional entity.

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGo4dEm9LkVYwURFDHh_pE7-pO5OV1LLks5qgbeMgaJpZM4JhFg3
.

[eaburns]

+1