klama

[lynn]

The old definition:

x₁ comes/goes to destination x₂ from origin x₃ via route x₄ using means/vehicle x₅.

People have long frowned upon the existence of the final two places. They’re stealing fi'o pluta and fi'o marce's work! We should get rid of them, probably.

[uakci]

x5 is essential to «klama»: it makes it different from «muvdu». But for the
x4 I'm totally unsure... ―uak

On Oct 3, 2016 9:52 PM, "Lynn" notifications@github.com wrote:

The old definition:

x1 comes/goes to destination x2 from origin x3 via route x4 using
means/vehicle x5.

People have long frowned upon the existence of the final two places.
They’re stealing fi'o pluta and fi'o marce's work! We should get rid
of them, probably.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#35, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGo4dL7txblBroqJjkmP2HpgRCIn-79Iks5qwVzygaJpZM4KM-FA
.

[Ntsekees]

It is thought that {klama} also differs from {muvdu} in that it's volitional, so it's more like {muvzu'e}.

[mklcp]

• Get rid of the x4 would break the pattern 'destination, origin, way'.
• if klama is muvzu'e, then muvzu'e has the semantic 'applied to itself': the volitional entity which undertakes the action of movement, applies this movement to itself ⦅OBLique, to retake ithkuil's typology⦆
• also, klama is not just I move to … from … ……, it is I come to … ……: the action is underlyingly defined and recognized ⦅ForMaL to retake ithkuil's typology⦆