Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix 10355: fullyQualifiedName was handling enums as other basic types #1346

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2013
Merged

Fix 10355: fullyQualifiedName was handling enums as other basic types #1346

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2013

Conversation

mihails-strasuns
Copy link

Trivial, caused by misattention and lack of test case for enum from my side when adding fullyQualifiedNameImplForTypes.

Are there any other basic types which are symbols at the same time?

@Poita
Copy link
Contributor

Poita commented Jun 14, 2013

Could you add a test for the enum value as well, e.g.

static assert(fqn!(QualifiedEnum.a) == "std.traits.QualifiedEnum.a");

@mihails-strasuns
Copy link
Author

@Poita Done.

@Poita
Copy link
Contributor

Poita commented Jun 14, 2013

LGTM

@9rnsr
Copy link
Contributor

9rnsr commented Jun 18, 2013

9rnsr added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2013
Fix 10355: fullyQualifiedName was handling enums as other basic types
@9rnsr 9rnsr merged commit 6054d6a into dlang:master Jun 18, 2013
@mihails-strasuns mihails-strasuns deleted the fix10355 branch October 14, 2014 02:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants