Skip to content

Conversation

Infiltrator
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Infiltrator
Copy link
Contributor Author

Could somebody please have a look over this and see whether the tests need to be more robust? I'm not sure how all ranges would interact with these changes.

@andralex
Copy link
Member

andralex commented Dec 8, 2015

Yah, that's right. Thanks!

andralex added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2015
Fix issue 12987 - topN should return the top portion of the range
@andralex andralex merged commit 3f9a33f into dlang:master Dec 8, 2015
@Infiltrator
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are problems with my changes in this PR, and I have updated my branch with some fixes. To get them, do we need to revert this PR and then do I need to open a new PR? Or is there an easier way?

@JackStouffer: please scrutinise. :)

@JackStouffer
Copy link
Contributor

You should open a new PR. Reverting this would take an extra PR anyway, so it might as well just be fixed.

Infiltrator added a commit to Infiltrator/phobos that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015
Bug unittests should go in their own blocks, and ranges should be
.saved.
Infiltrator added a commit to Infiltrator/phobos that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015
Bug unittests should go in their own blocks.
Infiltrator added a commit to Infiltrator/phobos that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2015
Bug unittests should go in their own blocks.
Infiltrator added a commit to Infiltrator/phobos that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2015
Bug unittests should go in their own blocks.
JakobOvrum added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2015
rcorre pushed a commit to rcorre/phobos that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2015
Bug unittests should go in their own blocks.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants