Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update twython to 3.6.0 #32

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2017

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

There's a new version of twython available.
You are currently using 3.5.0. I have updated it to 3.6.0

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Repo

Changelog

3.6.0

++++++++++++++++++

  • Improve replacing of entities with links in html_for_tweet()
  • Update classifiers for PyPI

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 23, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 40.153% when pulling 033e1c5 on pyup-update-twython-3.5.0-to-3.6.0 into 64bd463 on master.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #32 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #32   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   40.15%   40.15%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        3128     3128           
=======================================
  Hits         1256     1256           
  Misses       1872     1872

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 64bd463...033e1c5. Read the comment docs.

@DEKHTIARJonathan DEKHTIARJonathan merged commit 658fac7 into master Aug 23, 2017
@DEKHTIARJonathan DEKHTIARJonathan deleted the pyup-update-twython-3.5.0-to-3.6.0 branch August 23, 2017 16:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants