Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move away from neovim #10

Closed
DJMcMayhem opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Move away from neovim #10

DJMcMayhem opened this issue Sep 29, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@DJMcMayhem
Copy link
Owner

Neovim is poorly supported on windows (not sure about mac). It would be nice to have it run on vim 8 instead of neovim for portability. This will require moving some logic into a vimscript "main function" of sorts, but I think that's OK. Doing that would probably also fix the timing bug

@RikerW
Copy link

RikerW commented Feb 9, 2017

It's default on mac. At least on OS X yosemite, neovim came installed by default, but vi and vim didn't. (they both were aliased to neovim)

@vihanb
Copy link
Collaborator

vihanb commented Feb 9, 2017

Wait wat it is otherway around 99% sure @RikerW

@vihanb
Copy link
Collaborator

vihanb commented Feb 9, 2017

I have done research and concluded vim is installed my default on all OS X and vi is mapped to vim

@kritixilithos
Copy link
Collaborator

kritixilithos commented Feb 9, 2017

@vihanb vi wasn't aliased to vim for me on my mac

@vihanb
Copy link
Collaborator

vihanb commented Feb 9, 2017

@kritixilithos I suppose it depends on the original version of mac your computer had installed but I can guarantee two things:

  • Neovim is not installed on macs by default
  • Vim is

@RikerW
Copy link

RikerW commented Feb 10, 2017

Okay, @vihanb is right. I clean installed OS X 10.11 and Vim was installed by default and vi was aliased to vim.

@DJMcMayhem
Copy link
Owner Author

Closed in aced470

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants