Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving the negative volume check into the geometry module #897

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Mar 5, 2024

Conversation

Davknapp
Copy link
Collaborator

As @jmark mentioned in #751 we should also move the no-negative-volume check into the geometry module.

All these boxes must be checked by the reviewers before merging the pull request:

As a reviewer please read through all the code lines and make sure that the code is fully understood, bug free, well-documented and well-structured.

General

  • The reviewer executed the new code features at least once and checked the results manually

  • The code follows the t8code coding guidelines

  • New source/header files are properly added to the Makefiles

  • The code is well documented

  • All function declarations, structs/classes and their members have a proper doxygen documentation

  • All new algorithms and data structures are sufficiently optimal in terms of memory and runtime (If this should be merged, but there is still potential for optimization, create a new issue)

Tests

  • The code is covered in an existing or new test case using Google Test

Github action

  • The code compiles without warning in debugging and release mode, with and without MPI (this should be executed automatically in a github action)

  • All tests pass (in various configurations, this should be executed automatically in a github action)

    If the Pull request introduces code that is not covered by the github action (for example coupling with a new library):

    • Should this use case be added to the github action?
    • If not, does the specific use case compile and all tests pass (check manually)

Scripts and Wiki

  • If a new directory with source-files is added, it must be covered by the script/find_all_source_files.scp to check the indentation of these files.
  • If this PR introduces a new feature, it must be covered in an example/tutorial and a Wiki article.

Licence

  • The author added a BSD statement to doc/ (or already has one)

Copy link
Collaborator

@sandro-elsweijer sandro-elsweijer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need a test for that

src/t8_geometry/t8_geometry_base.hxx Show resolved Hide resolved
@sandro-elsweijer
Copy link
Collaborator

Did you forget to push the t8_geometry_zero.h?

Base automatically changed from feature-point_inside_check_for_axis_aligned_geom to main February 14, 2024 12:50
@Davknapp
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Did you forget to push the t8_geometry_zero.h?

I don't think so? Is there anything missing?

@lukasdreyer lukasdreyer assigned Davknapp and unassigned lukasdreyer Feb 28, 2024
@Davknapp Davknapp assigned lukasdreyer and unassigned Davknapp Feb 29, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@sandro-elsweijer sandro-elsweijer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one small thing

@sandro-elsweijer sandro-elsweijer removed their assignment Mar 5, 2024
@sandro-elsweijer sandro-elsweijer merged commit 66307c2 into main Mar 5, 2024
8 checks passed
@sandro-elsweijer sandro-elsweijer deleted the feature-geometry_negative_volume_check branch March 5, 2024 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Enhances already existing code
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants