Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor to have one Capabilities and a DeviceType #518

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

edenhaus
Copy link
Contributor

@edenhaus edenhaus commented Jun 3, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new capabilities for devices, including device_type, fan_speed, map, and water.
    • Added a new DeviceType enum for better categorization.
  • Refactor

    • Simplified type annotations and removed unnecessary generics across multiple modules for better code maintainability and readability.
    • Standardized the use of Capabilities across various hardware modules.
  • Tests

    • Updated test fixtures and function signatures to align with the new type annotations and capability structures.

@edenhaus edenhaus added pr: Breaking Change Pull request with braking changes pr: refactor PR with code refactoring labels Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes to the deebot_client library involve refactoring the handling of device capabilities. This includes removing the generic type parameters from various classes, such as Device, DeviceInfo, and StaticDeviceInfo, and standardizing the use of a new Capabilities class with specific device types. These changes simplify the codebase by eliminating unnecessary complexity and ensuring consistent capability handling across different device types.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
deebot_client/api_client.py Adjusted get_devices method to handle a list of DeviceInfo or ApiDeviceInfo without generic type parameters.
deebot_client/capabilities.py Introduced new capabilities and defined a new DeviceType enum.
deebot_client/device.py Removed DeviceCapabilities type parameter from Device class and related declarations.
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/... Replaced VacuumCapabilities and MowerCapabilities with Capabilities, added DeviceType in Capabilities constructor.
deebot_client/models.py Refactored type annotations, removed unnecessary imports, simplified StaticDeviceInfo and DeviceInfo classes by removing generic type parameters.
tests/conftest.py, tests/hardware/test_init.py, tests/helpers/__init__.py, tests/test_device.py Updated test fixtures and function signatures to reflect the removal of Capabilities type parameter.

Poem

In the world of code so bright,
Capabilities take flight.
Generics now are gone away,
Simplified, we pave the way.
Devices hum a clearer tune,
As rabbits cheer beneath the moon. 🌙🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.32%. Comparing base (cd36fab) to head (5676abd).

Files Patch % Lines
deebot_client/api_client.py 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #518      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.33%   86.32%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines        3270     3269       -1     
  Branches      532      530       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         2823     2822       -1     
  Misses        395      395              
  Partials       52       52              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@edenhaus edenhaus marked this pull request as ready for review June 3, 2024 18:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd36fab and 5676abd.

Files selected for processing (19)
  • deebot_client/api_client.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/capabilities.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/device.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/2o4lnm.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/5xu9h3.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/9s1s80.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/init.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/e6ofmn.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fallback.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/p1jij8.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/p95mgv.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/umwv6z.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/hardware/deebot/yna5xi.py (3 hunks)
  • deebot_client/models.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/conftest.py (4 hunks)
  • tests/hardware/test_init.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/helpers/init.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_device.py (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • deebot_client/device.py
  • tests/test_device.py
Additional context used
Path-based instructions (1)
tests/conftest.py (1)

Pattern tests/**.py: Use pytest as the test framework, not unittest.

GitHub Check: codecov/patch
deebot_client/api_client.py

[warning] 65-65: deebot_client/api_client.py#L65
Added line #L65 was not covered by tests

Additional comments not posted (24)
deebot_client/hardware/deebot/__init__.py (2)

22-22: The global dictionary DEVICES is correctly updated to remove the generic type parameter.


31-31: The function signature of get_static_device_info has been simplified by removing the generic type parameter. Ensure that all calls to this function across the codebase are updated to reflect this change.

tests/helpers/__init__.py (1)

48-48: The function mock_static_device_info now returns StaticDeviceInfo without a generic type parameter, aligning with the changes in the model definitions.

deebot_client/models.py (1)

8-8: The removal of generic type parameters and the update of type annotations in StaticDeviceInfo and DeviceInfo are consistent with the PR's objectives to simplify type structures.

Also applies to: 11-11, 30-30, 34-34, 38-38, 42-42

deebot_client/api_client.py (1)

49-49: The function signature of get_devices has been updated to reflect the removal of the generic type parameter. This change should be verified across the codebase to ensure all calls to this function are updated accordingly.

Verification successful

The search results indicate that the get_devices function is called in the README.md file. However, there are no other calls to get_devices in the codebase, which suggests that the function signature update does not impact other parts of the code.

  • README.md: devices_ = await api_client.get_devices()

Since the README.md is not part of the executable code, it does not affect the functionality of the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `get_devices` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type python $'get_devices'

Length of output: 61



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `get_devices` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature.
rg 'get_devices'

Length of output: 498

tests/conftest.py (1)

129-129: The fixtures static_device_info and device_info have been updated to use the new StaticDeviceInfo and DeviceInfo without generic type parameters. This aligns with the changes in the models and ensures consistency in test setups.

Also applies to: 150-151

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/5xu9h3.py (1)

Line range hint 6-17: The introduction of the DeviceType enum and the updated Capabilities class in the DEVICES dictionary entry for this module aligns with the PR's objectives to refactor the capabilities system. This change enhances the modularity and readability of the device capabilities.

Also applies to: 76-76

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/yna5xi.py (2)

Line range hint 6-19: The updated imports correctly reflect the new structure and usage of DeviceType and Capabilities.


91-92: The instantiation of Capabilities with DeviceType.VACUUM is correctly implemented and aligns with the new enum structure.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/fallback.py (2)

Line range hint 6-19: The updated imports correctly reflect the new structure and usage of DeviceType and Capabilities.


97-98: The instantiation of Capabilities with DeviceType.VACUUM is correctly implemented and aligns with the new enum structure.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/x5d34r.py (2)

Line range hint 6-19: The updated imports correctly reflect the new structure and usage of DeviceType and Capabilities.


97-98: The instantiation of Capabilities with DeviceType.VACUUM is correctly implemented and aligns with the new enum structure.

deebot_client/capabilities.py (2)

240-244: The introduction of the DeviceType enum is well-implemented and enhances the clarity and categorization of device types.


211-227: The modifications to the Capabilities class, including the addition of new attributes and the removal of the generic type parameter, are correctly implemented and simplify the class structure.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/p1jij8.py (2)

Line range hint 6-19: The updated imports correctly reflect the new structure and usage of DeviceType and Capabilities.


100-101: The instantiation of Capabilities with DeviceType.VACUUM is correctly implemented and aligns with the new enum structure.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/2o4lnm.py (2)

Line range hint 6-19: The updated imports correctly reflect the new structure and usage of DeviceType and Capabilities.


104-105: The instantiation of Capabilities with DeviceType.VACUUM is correctly implemented and aligns with the new enum structure.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/p95mgv.py (1)

109-110: The introduction of DeviceType.VACUUM and the instantiation of Capabilities align well with the PR's objectives. The detailed setup of capabilities ensures that the device's functionalities are well represented.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/umwv6z.py (1)

109-110: Consistent implementation of DeviceType.VACUUM and Capabilities across different device models. This standardization is beneficial for maintaining uniformity in device capabilities handling.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/9s1s80.py (1)

109-110: Implementation of DeviceType.VACUUM and Capabilities is consistent across different files, ensuring a standardized approach to capability management.

deebot_client/hardware/deebot/e6ofmn.py (1)

107-108: The introduction of DeviceType.VACUUM and the detailed setup of Capabilities, including the new cleaning log capability, are well-implemented and enhance the model's functionality.

tests/hardware/test_init.py (1)

100-100: The test cases are updated to reflect the new capabilities system, ensuring comprehensive testing of the changes introduced in the main codebase.

deebot_client/api_client.py Show resolved Hide resolved
@edenhaus edenhaus merged commit 6628f81 into dev Jun 4, 2024
8 checks passed
@edenhaus edenhaus deleted the device_type_cap branch June 4, 2024 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pr: Breaking Change Pull request with braking changes pr: refactor PR with code refactoring
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant