Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added eslint config #9

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added eslint config #9

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Oct 9, 2018

This is a hybrid config built on Wes Bos' eslint configuration. I have been using it on React, Express, and GraphQL projects for the last 6 months or so.

@jchiatt jchiatt requested a review from mtliendo October 17, 2018 15:04
Copy link

@mtliendo mtliendo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

First and foremost, thanks for taking the time to contribute. It's greatly appreciated! This seems like a great starter for when the frontend and backend are bundled together, I'm just not sure if that's the goal here.

With it just being an express backend API, I believe anything related to React can safely be removed.

.eslintrc.js Outdated
"airbnb",
"prettier",
"prettier/react"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need React eslint rules in this project? My understanding was that it's just an express server sending over data.

"parser": "babel-eslint",
"parserOptions": {
"ecmaVersion": 8,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the package.json, we should additionally enforce the JS version with an engines key. That way it's clear why we are parsing at version 8.

.eslintrc.js Outdated
"browser": true,
"node": true,
"jquery": true

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would remove jquery as it's not currently a dependency.

"test": true,
"expect": true,
"afterEach": true,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we also need to add in beforeEach and describe?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 24, 2018

@mtliendo Hi Michael

What engine specs are you looking for? I went with "node": ">=0.10.3 <0.12"

All the other comment recommendations should be taken care of.

Share your thoughts.

@mtliendo
Copy link

I don't think we should support unmaintained versions of node. It's safe to use node >=8. I'd prefer to just support 10, but technically both are the current release.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 3, 2018

@mtliendo I had a chance to swap out the node version. Happy to help. -Cheers

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Nov 3, 2018

Quick question. Are you considering GraphQL for any part of the API?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant