You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The released codebase, Table 6, and the final models use BEVDepth repository's formulation for the depth loss. Table 4 is from slightly earlier experiments I did where I used BEVDet's reproduction of BEVDepth's depth loss. the two implementations have some minor differences, and I adopted BEVDepth's loss for its slightly better performance. Each table is self-consistent, however (same in all settings besides the ablated components).
What's the difference in the setting between the two experiments about long-term fusion? I think their results should be the same.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: