Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question about long-term fusion performance #6

Closed
hanchunrui opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Question about long-term fusion performance #6

hanchunrui opened this issue Mar 23, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@hanchunrui
Copy link

hanchunrui commented Mar 23, 2023

What's the difference in the setting between the two experiments about long-term fusion? I think their results should be the same.

image
image

@hanchunrui hanchunrui changed the title Question about long-term fusion performance None Mar 23, 2023
@hanchunrui hanchunrui changed the title None Question about long-term fusion performance Mar 23, 2023
@Divadi
Copy link
Owner

Divadi commented Mar 23, 2023

The released codebase, Table 6, and the final models use BEVDepth repository's formulation for the depth loss. Table 4 is from slightly earlier experiments I did where I used BEVDet's reproduction of BEVDepth's depth loss. the two implementations have some minor differences, and I adopted BEVDepth's loss for its slightly better performance. Each table is self-consistent, however (same in all settings besides the ablated components).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants