Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID? Yes. Were you needing something like this?
I would also consider a pull request ... or could just publish this as an update with new version (QuickPID 3.1.4) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Added default constrictor - new version published (QuickPID 3.1.4) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I am developing a project that needs the PID class to be inherited or prototyped, what is not allowed with a class with no default constructor. I am using PID_v1 and I had to modify the library in order to create a default constructor, but I am not comfortable using non-standard libraries. I want my code to be as compatible as possible with the tools available to the community, so people can use my work as I use the work of others.
I thought about creating a branch on PID-v1 and ask for a pull request of my version, but that project is kind of abandoned.
Is it possible to include a default constructor in QuickPID? I would gladly do it myself if I was allowed to create a branch and them request a pull.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions