-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feat run param sep #188
Feat run param sep #188
Conversation
Codecov Report
❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more. @@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #188 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 77.34% 79.52% +2.17%
===========================================
Files 50 51 +1
Lines 6364 6421 +57
===========================================
+ Hits 4922 5106 +184
+ Misses 1442 1315 -127
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
… segments (dis_hru, dis_seg) and onto individual PRMS processes defined in pywatershed
…ers to individual processes, individual process tests passing
…er] while maintaining backwards compatability, very minor changes to api (passing list instead of unpacking list for arguments).
…Process subclass Process is conservative
…t from a Process class which does not have a budget. remove options from model except for input_dir, all other options go via control, new set_options on Process and ConservativeProcess
…n, respectively. Details of control.yml files input_dir.
Does this address #145? |
This PR
dis_hru
anddis_seg
for the nhm as special "discretization" subsets of the NHM/PRMSwhats-new.rst
api.rst
or it's sub rsts?