Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Retry when STAC query fails #58

Open
lukasValentin opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Retry when STAC query fails #58

lukasValentin opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
@lukasValentin
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@lukasValentin
Copy link
Collaborator

Due to some problems at Microsoft Planetary Computer (see here) the REST-API calls to STAC using the pystac-client should be made more robust to avoid HTTPS errors when querying the STAC catalog.

As proposed here we will add the Retry operator to the HTTP Adapter when working with pystac-client.
@lukasValentin lukasValentin added the enhancement New feature or request label May 26, 2023
@lukasValentin lukasValentin self-assigned this May 26, 2023
lukasValentin added a commit to lukasValentin/eodal that referenced this issue May 26, 2023
@lukasValentin
NUMBER_HTTPS_RETRIES added as parameter (EOA-team#58)
2ac5338
lukasValentin added a commit to lukasValentin/eodal that referenced this issue May 26, 2023
@lukasValentin
retry on HTTPS 502, 503, 504 errors (EOA-team#58)
9a576db
@lukasValentin lukasValentin mentioned this issue May 26, 2023
Merged
@lukasValentin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#59 has been merged into the master branch adding the NUMBER_HTTPS_RETRIES parameter to the pystac-client call.

Once the default behavior of the pystac-client library changes (see here) the code in the eodal STAC client module can be adopted.

Therefore, I'll leave this issue open for the time being.

@lukasValentin lukasValentin added this to the v0.2.2 milestone Jun 5, 2023
@lukasValentin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Missing https adapter has been added by @rubenbaer (#75).

@lukasValentin lukasValentin removed this from the v0.2.2 milestone Nov 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@lukasValentin lukasValentin

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@lukasValentin