Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can CAM 2 degree run on derecho? #907

Closed
sglanvil opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 13 comments
Closed

Can CAM 2 degree run on derecho? #907

sglanvil opened this issue Oct 17, 2023 · 13 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sglanvil
Copy link

What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?

Can you run a 2 degree (ne16pg3_ne16pg3_mg17) CAM run on derecho? I honestly just want to see if it works, because I can't get resubmits to work for 2 degree WACCM on derecho. However, 1 degree WACCM works fine on derecho.

Could you run a 2 degree CAM, preferably tag 119 (but whatever), and have it RESUBMIT a few times?

I feel like it's not possible. But, please, prove me wrong. :)

See my (failed) 2 degree WACCM run for inspiration:
/glade/u/home/sglanvil/cases/f.e23.FWmaHIST.ne16pg3_mg17_L135_tag119_beres0.6

PS Note, I CAN run 2 degree WACCM (with successful resubmits) if I use a single node. But, you know, LOL.
PPS I have updated the parallelio, and it didn't help.

Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?

No response

Will this change (regression test) answers?

I Don't Know

Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?

No

@sglanvil sglanvil added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 17, 2023
@fvitt
Copy link

fvitt commented Oct 17, 2023

@sglanvil
Is there a particular reason to use cam tag cam6_3_119? We have merged in updates for derecho after that tag. Would you be able to use cam6_3_130 for your runs?

@sglanvil
Copy link
Author

sglanvil commented Oct 17, 2023 via email

@cacraigucar
Copy link
Collaborator

For future questions - please post them in the forum: https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/cesm/

Issues in ESCOMP/CAM are reserved for proposed code changes. Help is provided via the forum.

See the wiki in ESCOMP/CAM for guidance. Specifically, https://github.com/ESCOMP/CAM/wiki/CAM-Development-Workflow-in-GitHub#how-to-notify-ncar-of-a-problem-bug-ask-a-question-or-to-request-a-new-feature-in-cam

@cacraigucar
Copy link
Collaborator

Also, I can let you know that getting derecho tests running already has an issue: #892. You could add your request to that issue if it is still a problem after you update.

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link
Collaborator

@sglanvil Apologies for telling you to post here ...

@fvitt
Copy link

fvitt commented Oct 17, 2023

@sglanvil
The "HB above clubb" change has been merge in -- tag cam6_3_127.

@fvitt
Copy link

fvitt commented Oct 17, 2023

@sglanvil

Restart tests with ne16pg3 grid in cam tag cam6_3_130 pass for me (CAM and WACCM-MA):

  PASS ERS_D_Ln9_P1280.ne16pg3z135_ne16pg3_mg17.FWmaHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq9s
  PASS ERS_Ld3.ne16pg3_ne16pg3_mg17.FHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq1d
  PASS ERS_Ld3_P1280x1.ne16pg3z135_ne16pg3_mg17.FWmaHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq3d

A WACCM-MA test case is here:

/glade/derecho/scratch/fvitt/ERS_Ld3_P1280x1.ne16pg3z135_ne16pg3_mg17.FWmaHIST.derecho_intel.cam-outfrq3d.tag130

@sglanvil
Copy link
Author

@fvitt thank you

@cacraigucar
Copy link
Collaborator

Since the discussion has been moved the NCAR/amwg_dev#415, should the issue be closed here now?

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link
Collaborator

The discussion started as a run request in NCAR/amwg_dev#415 whereafter I adviced (wrongly I suppose) to open an issue in ESCOMP (as this was a problem with the model not running).

Maybe problem has been resolved? @sglanvil

@cacraigucar
Copy link
Collaborator

The discussion started as a run request in NCAR/amwg_dev#415 whereafter I adviced (wrongly I suppose) to open an issue in ESCOMP (as this was a problem with the model not running).

Maybe problem has been resolved? @sglanvil

This is kind of a gray area. Opening bugs as an issue is totally correct. I interpreted the original posting (perhaps wrongly) as just asking for help.

@sglanvil
Copy link
Author

@cacraigucar Problem resolved by using @fvitt tag 119:
/glade/work/fvitt/camdev/cam6_3_119

From Francis: "Here I updated PIO to version pio2_6_2 and ccs_config (machine scripts) to ccs_config_cesm0.0.75."

So now I can run 2 degree WACCM on derecho, and it will resubmit successfully.

Thank you.

@peverwhee
Copy link
Collaborator

closing this issuue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants