-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can CAM 2 degree run on derecho? #907
Comments
@sglanvil |
I can try tag 130, but there appear to be many changes (to stuff like
gw_drag.F90).
But, yes, I'll give 130 a try. Do I need to continue adding the HB
diffusion source mods, or have those been incorporated correctly into this
newer tag?
Can you point me to a CAM case (tag130) that has been working?
Thanks.
Sasha
…On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:59 PM Francis Vitt ***@***.***> wrote:
@sglanvil <https://github.com/sglanvil>
Is there a particular reason to use cam tag cam6_3_119? We have merged in
updates for derecho after that tag. Would you be able to use cam6_3_130 for
your runs?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#907 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AMK4HBU64FT5F6CCR53F3JTX73BPDAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6EFZ4OWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTONRWHEYDEMRVGU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
For future questions - please post them in the forum: https://bb.cgd.ucar.edu/cesm/ Issues in ESCOMP/CAM are reserved for proposed code changes. Help is provided via the forum. See the wiki in ESCOMP/CAM for guidance. Specifically, https://github.com/ESCOMP/CAM/wiki/CAM-Development-Workflow-in-GitHub#how-to-notify-ncar-of-a-problem-bug-ask-a-question-or-to-request-a-new-feature-in-cam |
Also, I can let you know that getting derecho tests running already has an issue: #892. You could add your request to that issue if it is still a problem after you update. |
@sglanvil Apologies for telling you to post here ... |
@sglanvil |
Restart tests with ne16pg3 grid in cam tag cam6_3_130 pass for me (CAM and WACCM-MA):
A WACCM-MA test case is here:
|
@fvitt thank you |
Since the discussion has been moved the NCAR/amwg_dev#415, should the issue be closed here now? |
The discussion started as a run request in NCAR/amwg_dev#415 whereafter I adviced (wrongly I suppose) to open an issue in ESCOMP (as this was a problem with the model not running). Maybe problem has been resolved? @sglanvil |
This is kind of a gray area. Opening bugs as an issue is totally correct. I interpreted the original posting (perhaps wrongly) as just asking for help. |
@cacraigucar Problem resolved by using @fvitt tag 119: From Francis: "Here I updated PIO to version pio2_6_2 and ccs_config (machine scripts) to ccs_config_cesm0.0.75." So now I can run 2 degree WACCM on derecho, and it will resubmit successfully. Thank you. |
closing this issuue |
What is the feature/what would you like to discuss?
Can you run a 2 degree (ne16pg3_ne16pg3_mg17) CAM run on derecho? I honestly just want to see if it works, because I can't get resubmits to work for 2 degree WACCM on derecho. However, 1 degree WACCM works fine on derecho.
Could you run a 2 degree CAM, preferably tag 119 (but whatever), and have it RESUBMIT a few times?
I feel like it's not possible. But, please, prove me wrong. :)
See my (failed) 2 degree WACCM run for inspiration:
/glade/u/home/sglanvil/cases/f.e23.FWmaHIST.ne16pg3_mg17_L135_tag119_beres0.6
PS Note, I CAN run 2 degree WACCM (with successful resubmits) if I use a single node. But, you know, LOL.
PPS I have updated the parallelio, and it didn't help.
Is there anyone in particular you want to be part of this conversation?
No response
Will this change (regression test) answers?
I Don't Know
Will you be implementing this enhancement yourself?
No
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: