-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add a template for pull request #19
Conversation
When I ran the PR template through a markdownlint tool I got: these comments21 - MD012 Multiple consecutive blank lines [Expected: 1; Actual: 2] |
Looks good to me. What do you think @ledm , let's merge? |
Looks good to me, only very minor comments. Nice work. |
We probably want to add a list of bullet points for PRs containing new lessons too:
Just some ideas, but think it would be useful. |
@JaroCamphuijsen @ledm Thanks for your comments. Regarding the linter tool for example, in vscode, a markdownlint can be installed as an extension. Users don’t need to run a command line for that. However, none-vscode users can install another tool via |
Thanks a lot. Indeed very useful items. Please see below:
For more info, please see https://carpentries.github.io/lesson-example/04-formatting/index.html |
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
Outdated
- [ ] If you are contributing to the lesson materials, make sure the content does not have spelling or grammar errors. See `Lesson development` in [CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ESMValGroup/tutorial/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md). | ||
- [ ] Please use a `markdown lint tool` to check that your files do not contain errors. See `Lesson development` in[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ESMValGroup/tutorial/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md). | ||
- [ ] Preview changes on your own machine before pushing them to GitHub by running `make serve`, alternatively `make docker-serve`. See `Lesson development` in[CONTRIBUTING.md](https://github.com/ESMValGroup/tutorial/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md). | ||
- [ ] All code instructions have been tested. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we want to make sure that these have been tested by the author and the reviewer?
- [ ] All code instructions have been tested. | |
- [ ] All code instructions have been tested by the PR author. | |
- [ ] All code instructions have been tested by the reviewer. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ledm Thanks. I think that by default both reviewers and authors should check all the items provided in this template. So, we don't need to mention reviewer
or author
for this specific item.
Co-Authored-By: Lee de Mora <ledm@pml.ac.uk>
Co-Authored-By: Lee de Mora <ledm@pml.ac.uk>
Co-Authored-By: Lee de Mora <ledm@pml.ac.uk>
Apart from the tiny comment I left, I think this is ready to merge! |
Co-Authored-By: Jaro Camphuijsen <jjecamphuijsen@gmail.com>
@ledm @JaroCamphuijsen I think the template is ready, Shall we merge this PR? |
It adds a PR template containing a list of tasks. It closes #18