Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Benchmark Beluga NDT-MCL against a groundtruth signal #316

Open
hidmic opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Benchmark Beluga NDT-MCL against a groundtruth signal #316

hidmic opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ros Related to ROS

Comments

@hidmic
Copy link
Collaborator

hidmic commented Feb 9, 2024

Feature description

Connected to #93. Depends on #312, #313 and #348. In addition to tests and micro benchmarks, NDT-MCL nodes' performance must be compared against a groundtruth signal to prove it's correctness and precision.

Implementation considerations

Pick a pair of suitable datasets and benchmark 2D and 3D using LAMBKIN.

@hidmic hidmic added enhancement New feature or request ros Related to ROS labels Feb 9, 2024
@serraramiro1 serraramiro1 self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@serraramiro1 serraramiro1 changed the title Benchmark Beluga NDT-MCL against Cartographer ROS Benchmark Beluga NDT-MCL against a groundtruth signal May 31, 2024
@serraramiro1
Copy link
Contributor

@hidmic @nahueespinosa @glpuga
Based on our conversations, and us wanting to diverge a bit from nav2_amcl and the difficulties of making "fair" comparisons between different sensor models and map representations, I've changed this ticket to track the benchmarking of the model against a groundtruth signal instead. LMK what you think.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ros Related to ROS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants