You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Connected to #93. Depends on #312, #313 and #348. In addition to tests and micro benchmarks, NDT-MCL nodes' performance must be compared against a groundtruth signal to prove it's correctness and precision.
Implementation considerations
Pick a pair of suitable datasets and benchmark 2D and 3D using LAMBKIN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@hidmic@nahueespinosa@glpuga
Based on our conversations, and us wanting to diverge a bit from nav2_amcl and the difficulties of making "fair" comparisons between different sensor models and map representations, I've changed this ticket to track the benchmarking of the model against a groundtruth signal instead. LMK what you think.
Feature description
Connected to #93. Depends on #312, #313 and #348. In addition to tests and micro benchmarks, NDT-MCL nodes' performance must be compared against a groundtruth signal to prove it's correctness and precision.
Implementation considerations
Pick a pair of suitable datasets and benchmark 2D and 3D using LAMBKIN.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: