Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MIG][10.0-Issue175-T23293] hr_timesheet_auto_creation. #182

Conversation

sudhir-serpentcs
Copy link

Migrated hr_timesheet_auto_creation in v10.
@elicoidal @seb-elico @victormartinelicocorp Please review.
This PR refers to issue #175

@sudhir-serpentcs sudhir-serpentcs mentioned this pull request Aug 28, 2017
11 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

@elicoidal elicoidal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

details. LGTM pending tests


* Business consultancy for Gap analysis, BPM, operational work-flows review.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please use latest template

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@elicoidal I already have used latest template.
Correct me if I am wrong and send me a new template or it's content.

Copy link
Contributor

@elicoidal elicoidal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@elicoidal elicoidal added this to the 10.0 milestone Sep 5, 2017
Copy link
Contributor

@victormmtorres victormmtorres left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To be tested

@elicoidal elicoidal merged commit 2cc9c34 into Elico-Corp:10.0 Mar 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants