NTR: solar radiation #587
Comments
|
If possible please could you also add as children of 'solar radiation' shortwave solar radiation Not a problem if you feel this would be too specific though |
|
Will do!
We may keep it at a high level for now as we figure out how to handle
energy in general, but the PURL will be stable.
…On 16 Jan 2018 15:52, "Varsha Khodiyar" ***@***.***> wrote:
If possible please could you also add as children of 'solar radiation'
shortwave solar radiation
longwave solar radiation
Not a problem if you feel this would be too specific though
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#587 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACK7MirAFUzpfpkYemk6sCns0p158Bm4ks5tLMWvgaJpZM4Rf_Sg>
.
|
|
PS: I'm working on a heliosphere release to follow up the Planetary Ecology
release, which should help this.
…On 17 Jan 2018 07:48, "Pier Luigi Buttigieg" ***@***.***> wrote:
Will do!
We may keep it at a high level for now as we figure out how to handle
energy in general, but the PURL will be stable.
On 16 Jan 2018 15:52, "Varsha Khodiyar" ***@***.***> wrote:
> If possible please could you also add as children of 'solar radiation'
>
> shortwave solar radiation
> longwave solar radiation
>
> Not a problem if you feel this would be too specific though
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#587 (comment)>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACK7MirAFUzpfpkYemk6sCns0p158Bm4ks5tLMWvgaJpZM4Rf_Sg>
> .
>
|
|
The particle wave duality is a bit of an ontological wormhole. We'll stick with
I've added Def: Equiv Axiom: I've cross-axiomatised this with
I've added a bunch of subclasses (see below) to the editors' version, but it's apparent that there are very variable thresholds when it comes to wavelengths and frequencies. Do your authors specify their ranges for short and long here? We could reference their DOI if so. Otherwise I'd guess "short" would be anything ultraviolet and above and long would be anything infrared and below.
|
|
Well since the sun is a star, you might want to make sure the subclassing fits…. - Ruth
PS: No I don’t know why I read this totally non-cryospheric topic
… On Feb 5, 2018, at 5:06 PM, Pier Luigi Buttigieg ***@***.***> wrote:
The particle wave duality is a bit of an ontological wormhole. We'll stick with electromagnetic radiation as a parent for now.
please could you add the new term
solar radiation
I've added stellar radiation (we stay general, but it's still applicable) to the editors' version with the PURL: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001211 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001211>
Def:
An electromagnetic radiation process during which electromagnetic waves or their quanta are emitted from a star.
Equiv Axiom:
'electromagnetic radiation' and 'has causal agent' some star
I've cross-axiomatised this with stellar wind
If possible please could you also add as children of 'solar radiation'
shortwave solar radiation
longwave solar radiation
I've added a bunch of subclasses (see below) to the editors' version, but it's apparent that there are very variable thresholds when it comes to wavelengths and frequencies. Do your authors specify their ranges for short and long here? We could reference their DOI if so. Otherwise I'd guess "short" would be anything ultraviolet and above and long would be anything infrared and below.
label PURL
'ionising stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001219 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001219>
'x-ray stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001217 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001217>
'gamma-ray stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001218 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001218>
'ultraviolet stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001216 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001216>
'visible spectrum stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001215 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001215>
'infrared stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001214 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001214>
'radio wave stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001213 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001213>
'microwave stellar radiation' http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001212 <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001212>
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#587 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABeSvGWJdI93vkP3241uWONNhQfunIQdks5tR5eagaJpZM4Rf_Sg>.
|
|
@rduerr did you spot an inconsistency? Our sea ice physics team certainly concern themselves with solar radiation, cryo perspectives are most welcome. |
|
stellar radiation works, thanks! The authors did not specify ranges, sorry. |
|
See also #618 |
|
Closing, since we have http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/ENVO_01001211 |
Axiomatized stellar-X-rad = X-rad and has-causal-agent some star Added "solar" narrow syns for stellar classes See #587
Hello,
please could you add the new term
solar radiation
I'm not sure if the best parent is
particle radiation ENVO:01001024
or
radiation ENVO:01001023
Glad to defer to your judgement on this.
Thanks,
Varsha
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: