docs: point issue submitting to main EV repo

[joanise]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 70.70%. Comparing base (01cd78e) to head (862d2af).

❗ Current head 862d2af differs from pull request most recent head 75ca553. Consider uploading reports for the commit 75ca553 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #296      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   70.85%   70.70%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        2505     2492      -13     
  Branches      384      383       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1775     1762      -13     
- Misses        661      662       +1     
+ Partials       69       68       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

CLI load time: 0:00.37
Pull Request HEAD: 75ca5530f5995fce62f7d8e1c1c7abc1d056ea25
Imports that take more than 0.1 s:
import time: self [us] | cumulative | imported package
import time:       259 |     112748 | typer

[roedoejet]

Looks good, except I think the HiFiGAN and wav2vec2 readme changes weren't included. I disabled Issues on the other repos. I'll look into making issue templates

[roedoejet]

looks like the PR for this wasn't created

[roedoejet]

was the wav2vec2aligner readme updated?

[joanise]

Right, I had push the branch for HiFiGAN but forgot to submit the PR. Fixed.
For wav2vec2aligner, I wavered: the repo is more stand-alone from EV, with no actual dependencies on EV, and you have not disabled issues on it, so I thought we'd want to not change its readme. But let me know if you want it the same way too, and I'll add it.

[roedoejet]

Right, I had push the branch for HiFiGAN but forgot to submit the PR. Fixed. For wav2vec2aligner, I wavered: the repo is more stand-alone from EV, with no actual dependencies on EV, and you have not disabled issues on it, so I thought we'd want to not change its readme. But let me know if you want it the same way too, and I'll add it.

I think you made the right choice, since it's more stand-alone. Let's leave the issues open there.