devel/binutils: Revert "devel/binutils: Update to 2.41"

This was an accidental misoperation of git.

This reverts commit 1421177.

devel/binutils/Makefile

@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
 PORTNAME=	binutils
-DISTVERSION=	2.41
+DISTVERSION=	2.40
+PORTREVISION=	4
 PORTEPOCH?=	1
 CATEGORIES?=	devel
 MASTER_SITES=	GNU \
@@ -117,7 +118,6 @@ INFO=		as \
 		gprof \
 		bfd \
 		ld \
-		ldint \
 		sframe-spec
 .endif
 

devel/binutils/distinfo

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
-TIMESTAMP = 1690831336
-SHA256 (binutils-2.41.tar.lz) = eab3444055882ed5eb04e2743d03f0c0e1bc950197a4ddd31898cd5a2843d065
-SIZE (binutils-2.41.tar.lz) = 26307264
+TIMESTAMP = 1673799644
+SHA256 (binutils-2.40.tar.lz) = 48e65ecee1bbcf334d7efb4ea8487fe048dea522e5da3bdf7fa42b1ec779ea33
+SIZE (binutils-2.40.tar.lz) = 24784952

devel/binutils/files/patch-bfd_elf.c

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+--- bfd/elf.c.orig	2023-01-14 00:00:00 UTC
++++ bfd/elf.c
+@@ -3870,21 +3870,23 @@ assign_section_numbers (bfd *abfd, struct bfd_link_inf
+ 	{
+ 	case SHT_REL:
+ 	case SHT_RELA:
+-	  /* A reloc section which we are treating as a normal BFD
+-	     section.  sh_link is the section index of the symbol
+-	     table.  sh_info is the section index of the section to
+-	     which the relocation entries apply.  We assume that an
+-	     allocated reloc section uses the dynamic symbol table
+-	     if there is one.  Otherwise we guess the normal symbol
+-	     table.  FIXME: How can we be sure?  */
+-	  if (d->this_hdr.sh_link == 0 && (sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0)
++	  /* sh_link is the section index of the symbol table.
++	     sh_info is the section index of the section to which the
++	     relocation entries apply.  */
++	  if (d->this_hdr.sh_link == 0)
+ 	    {
+-	      s = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".dynsym");
+-	      if (s != NULL)
+-		d->this_hdr.sh_link = elf_section_data (s)->this_idx;
++	      /* FIXME maybe: If this is a reloc section which we are
++		 treating as a normal section then we likely should
++		 not be assuming its sh_link is .dynsym or .symtab.  */
++	      if ((sec->flags & SEC_ALLOC) != 0)
++		{
++		  s = bfd_get_section_by_name (abfd, ".dynsym");
++		  if (s != NULL)
++		    d->this_hdr.sh_link = elf_section_data (s)->this_idx;
++		}
++	      else
++		d->this_hdr.sh_link = elf_onesymtab (abfd);
+ 	    }
+-	  if (d->this_hdr.sh_link == 0)
+-	    d->this_hdr.sh_link = elf_onesymtab (abfd);
+
+ 	  s = elf_get_reloc_section (sec);
+ 	  if (s != NULL)

devel/binutils/files/patch-ld_ldlang.c

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+--- ld/ldlang.c.orig	2023-01-13 16:00:00.000000000 -0800
++++ ld/ldlang.c	2023-05-13 21:48:06.006092000 -0700
+@@ -649,7 +649,8 @@
+ 	 looking at the sections for this file.  */
+
+       /* Find the correct node to append this section.  */
+-      if (compare_section (sec->spec.sorted, section, (*tree)->section) < 0)
++      if (sec && sec->spec.sorted != none && sec->spec.sorted != by_none
++	  && compare_section (sec->spec.sorted, section, (*tree)->section) < 0)
+ 	tree = &((*tree)->left);
+       else
+ 	tree = &((*tree)->right);

devel/binutils/pkg-plist

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ include/sframe-api.h
 include/sframe.h
 include/symcat.h
 %%SHARED%%lib/bfd-plugins/libdep.so
-%%SHARED%%lib/libbfd-2.41.so
+%%SHARED%%lib/libbfd-2.40.so
 lib/libbfd.a
 %%SHARED%%lib/libbfd.so
 lib/libctf-nobfd.a
@@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ lib/libctf.a
 %%SHARED%%lib/libctf.so
 %%SHARED%%lib/libctf.so.0
 %%SHARED%%lib/libctf.so.0.0.0
-%%SHARED%%lib/libopcodes-2.41.so
+%%SHARED%%lib/libopcodes-2.40.so
 lib/libopcodes.a
 %%SHARED%%lib/libopcodes.so
 lib/libsframe.a
 %%SHARED%%lib/libsframe.so
-%%SHARED%%lib/libsframe.so.1
-%%SHARED%%lib/libsframe.so.1.0.0
+%%SHARED%%lib/libsframe.so.0
+%%SHARED%%lib/libsframe.so.0.0.0
 man/man1/addr2line.1.gz
 man/man1/ar.1.gz
 man/man1/as.1.gz
@@ -116,7 +116,6 @@ man/man1/strip.1.gz
 %%NLS%%share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gas.mo
 %%NLS%%share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
 %%NLS%%share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/ld.mo
-%%NLS%%share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/bfd.mo
 %%NLS%%share/locale/ka/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
 %%NLS%%share/locale/ms/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo
 %%NLS%%share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/gprof.mo