Either fix ert failures or mark them as expected

[temyurchenko]

Expected behavior

Running cask exec ert-runner results in no failing tests.

Actual behavior

First, ert-runner complains about duplicated test names. However, even after we fix those, we get 42 failures. The best and simplest way to deal with those is to mark them as «expected failures». It is slightly complicated due to some tests being wrapped in macros.

Steps to reproduce the problem

Run cask build followed by cask exec ert-runner.

Backtraces if necessary (M-x toggle-debug-on-error)

Environment & version information

• smartparens version: 20231024.1804
• Active major-mode: fundamental-mode
• Smartparens strict mode: nil
• Emacs version (M-x emacs-version): GNU Emacs 29.2 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.24.40, cairo version 1.18.0)
• Starterkit/Distribution: Vanilla
• OS: gnu/linux

[Fuco1]

The failing test cases need to be corrected, they should not be failing. I am slowly fixing some but it's a long process.

[temyurchenko]

The failing test cases need to be corrected, they should not be failing. I am slowly fixing some but it's a long process.

Oh, yes, I absolutely get that. Sorry, if that sounded pressuring. I was just reading the contributing guide, which advised to run a test-suite, which I ran and it showed a lot of errors. I haven't found any documentation about that in the repo, so I decided to make an issue for others who might be confused.

[Fuco1]

No worries :)

[Fuco1]

I'll make a new issue with all the failing tests so I can track progress individually.