You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
using the NYC data, I created a custom break with six categories for kids2000. That’s illustrated in the updated mapping chapter. When I use this category in a histogram for kids2000, all is well. However, when I use
it in a histogram for kids2009, it gives a very weird result on the axes and the statistics.
As it happens, kids2009 does not have any observations over 50, which is the highest
breakpoint in custom1, the custom category. The histogram drawing code doesn’t seem
to know how to deal with that. See also, the strange values for the range in the last bin
in the statistics part, going from 50 to 48.1!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lixun910
added a commit
to lixun910/geoda
that referenced
this issue
Sep 26, 2020
using the NYC data, I created a custom break with six categories for kids2000. That’s illustrated in the updated mapping chapter. When I use this category in a histogram for kids2000, all is well. However, when I use
it in a histogram for kids2009, it gives a very weird result on the axes and the statistics.
As it happens, kids2009 does not have any observations over 50, which is the highest
breakpoint in custom1, the custom category. The histogram drawing code doesn’t seem
to know how to deal with that. See also, the strange values for the range in the last bin
in the statistics part, going from 50 to 48.1!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: