Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix for version 201 #1820

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2019
Merged

Fix for version 201 #1820

merged 6 commits into from
Feb 21, 2019

Conversation

lixun910
Copy link
Member

#1818 Edit String content in Table crashes GeoDa in V197
#1817 bounding box issue with multiple layers
#1810 Table - stack: problem with edit variable properties
#1809 Enhancement for Chinese translation
#1819 Table: editing is limited to 10 digits in an integer field
#1815 UI update for weights creation dialog when loading a table-only dataset
fix: converting column (string type) with numbers using comma as a decimal separator to real type.
enhancement: support case sensitive “variable names” on some data format e.g. ESRI shapefile)

This is caused by new feature: saving encoded characters in geoda.
Make the full extent set using the top layer bounding box;
When reorder layers in MapLayerSettings dialog, set map extent using top layer bounding box automatically;
prevent reset extent when change layer order after zoom/pan
fix: editing is limited to 10 digits in a integer field in table

update the logic of resize column width based on content instead of using column lable width;
when GeoDa loads a table-only data source, only "Variables" based "Distance Weight" is enabled in Weights File Creation dialog.
Set to use default en_US number formatting, which use DOT as  decimal separator internal.

If COMMA decimal separator used in data (e.g. csv),  GeoDa will read the value as string by default, and user can convert  the field from string to real by automatically detecting if DOT/COMMA used as decimal separator.
@lixun910 lixun910 merged commit b64313a into GeoDaCenter:master Feb 21, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant