Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PNUZ new RCET station #1696

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 18, 2023
Merged

PNUZ new RCET station #1696

merged 13 commits into from
May 18, 2023

Conversation

mnaguit
Copy link
Contributor

@mnaguit mnaguit commented May 16, 2023

  • TC120PH-2 (SN 3816) for LC 10 (LH/HH-ENZ streams)
  • Fortis (TF1126) for LC 20 (HN-ENZ streams)
  • Centaur firmware v4.5.20

Is the network code RA? @CBurton90 @salichon

new RCET station
add Centaur (7982)
- open Fortis for LC 20 (TF1126)
- open TC120PH-2 for LC 10 (3816)
open Centaur (7982)
open LC 10 (LH/HH-ENZ) and LC 20 (HN-ENZ)
@mnaguit mnaguit self-assigned this May 16, 2023
@CBurton90
Copy link
Contributor

@mnaguit Is it worth including @staylorofford in the reviews for the RCET sites? I know the majority should have been installed in a shallow posthole vault so we might need some consistency in regards to depth (but perhaps 0 is fine and that's ok with me 😄 )

CBurton90
CBurton90 previously approved these changes May 16, 2023
@mnaguit
Copy link
Contributor Author

mnaguit commented May 16, 2023

Hi @staylorofford . We will include you in all RCET delta reviews, so you can have a good look of the delta nitty-gritty.

@staylorofford
Copy link
Contributor

staylorofford commented May 16, 2023

Hold fire on merging this - I will check the depth with Brendon

@CBurton90
Copy link
Contributor

@staylorofford Was there a standardize depth planned for all RCET sites or were they designed to vary slightly location dependent (or how the contractor actually built the vault)? Just wondering if there is a "blanket" value we can put in for all the sites so it represents them nicely.

@staylorofford
Copy link
Contributor

SM sensor is at 0 m (loc 20) while WM sensor is at 1.2 m (loc 10)

Copy link
Contributor

@staylorofford staylorofford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above

modify sensor depth (LC10)
@staylorofford
Copy link
Contributor

@CBurton90, all weak motion sensors should be at 1.2 m install depth, all strong motion will be at 0 m. The contractors drilled to specification 1.2 m on all sites.

@mnaguit
Copy link
Contributor Author

mnaguit commented May 16, 2023

Sensor depth for TC120PH-2 updated to 1.2m

staylorofford
staylorofford previously approved these changes May 16, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@staylorofford staylorofford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I approve these depths.

install/connections.csv Show resolved Hide resolved
edit entry to include logger channel
@mnaguit
Copy link
Contributor Author

mnaguit commented May 17, 2023

Waiting for 3 👍 on this one, before I issue another PR for the other RCET (KRBZ). FYI Gentlemen!

Copy link
Contributor

@salichon salichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool as ;)

@mnaguit mnaguit merged commit cc3d64e into GeoNet:main May 18, 2023
@mnaguit mnaguit deleted the PNUZ_RCET branch May 18, 2023 01:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants