Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider adding Chrome stable to Travis matrix #1480

Closed
patrickhulce opened this issue Jan 17, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Consider adding Chrome stable to Travis matrix #1480

patrickhulce opened this issue Jan 17, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator

patrickhulce commented Jan 17, 2017

Context: Recently CSS usage broke Lighthouse master on Chrome stable since the protocol method wasn't added until v56 (#1473).

It would be great to have Travis automatically check against these types of errors. Not sure how we would want to handle the failures/tests though since we would still want to ensure the smoke tests for canary were run.

@brendankenny
Copy link
Member

Simplest solution: smoke tests take a combined ~1.5 minutes on travis right now. We could easily download Chrome latest and Chrome stable and just double that up. Obviously that's a lot of duplication of work, though, and only going to get more painful as the smoke tests grow.

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Oh @brendankenny I took that as a given, I meant more how do we handle the failures that result because stable lacks the feature support. Example: the CSS usage gatherer will fail on stable as expected and set a debug string which won't pass the expectations file. Should we maintain separate expectations, mark as OK to fail, etc?

@wardpeet
Copy link
Collaborator

wardpeet commented Jan 17, 2017

what do you guys think about 2 travis checks? I for linting/unit tests, ... & 1 for smokehouse (stable and canary)?

@brendankenny
Copy link
Member

for these differences between stable and canary, I think we're just going to have to go back to being stricter about not landing new audits or driver commands until supported by Chrome stable, rather than having a different expectation for each version.

This will still be a bit hard with audit changes due to Chrome changes, e.g. new deprecation warnings coming in Canary (one of the errors in the log in #1573 (comment))

@patrickhulce
Copy link
Collaborator Author

fixed by #2547 ! 🎉 moving forward we'll probably want to stick to tests that only pass in stable

@XhmikosR
Copy link
Contributor

XhmikosR commented Jun 20, 2017 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants