Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

H5TS_win32_thread_exit #396

Merged
merged 97 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021
Merged

H5TS_win32_thread_exit #396

merged 97 commits into from
Mar 1, 2021

Conversation

byrnHDF
Copy link
Contributor

@byrnHDF byrnHDF commented Feb 26, 2021

This is the PR to replace #359.
Plus h5dump gen 1.6 API fix.

= TLS_OUT_OF_INDEXES
#endif
;
#endif /* H5_HAVE_CODESTACK */
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely not a fan of this format. I'd just duplicate the variable declaration, as is done below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I missed that one - but with 4 instances it was way too busy and the formatter insisted on tabs making it look wierder.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the problem I had was the original had some comments that just made it looked messy!
Updated with better.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the static attribute okay? I think I accidentally used the H5TS_key_t H5TS_cancel_key_s section as a template.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind - the action check told me!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

okay format is weird - but that's what it wants.

@byrnHDF
Copy link
Contributor Author

byrnHDF commented Feb 26, 2021

I can do which ever you prefer.

@byrnHDF byrnHDF requested a review from lrknox as a code owner February 28, 2021 21:35
@lrknox lrknox merged commit f2a1552 into HDFGroup:develop Mar 1, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants