Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add source release action #214

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022
Merged

Add source release action #214

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 25, 2022

Conversation

graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member

@graeme-a-stewart graeme-a-stewart commented Dec 21, 2021

As the GitHub source archives do not contain any
submodules they are not very useful for people
wishing to build a released
version of prmon. This action should build a source release
archive with resursion switched on at checkout, so that
spdlog will be included correctly.

Closes #209

As the GitHub source archives do not contain any
submodules they are not very useful for people
wishing to build a released
version of prmon. This action should build a source release
archive with resursion switched on at checkout, so that
spdlog will be included correctly.
@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member Author

Hi Serhan - in principle this should fix #209, but I am trying to think how to think if there's a way to test it without making half a dozen dummy releases.

Change unpacked directory to be prmon-VERSION
Tarball itself is just VERSION.tar.xz
Copy link
Collaborator

@amete amete left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thanks a lot @graeme-a-stewart. Let's see how this behaves w/ the next release.

@amete amete merged commit aaae202 into main Jan 25, 2022
@amete amete deleted the source-release branch January 25, 2022 11:05
@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member Author

I think the unpacked directory name is going to be very slightly different, viz,. prmon-v3.0.1, but would that be a problem?

@amete
Copy link
Collaborator

amete commented Jan 25, 2022

I think it's more of a convention than anything else. Therefore, I don't think it'll be a problem but we'll know for sure when we try to do a full deployment 😄

@nikoladze
Copy link

Thanks a lot! I tried it in my fork and it seemed to work fine 🙂

@graeme-a-stewart
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks a lot for checking @nikoladze !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Submodule missing from source tarball
3 participants