Updated some issues of the PSI meeting

[julianu]

• added PSI MS relations ([CV] PSI-MS relations to our entries (see #53) #54)
• removed length information from value ([CV] Issue with cv-term values and the use of cv in mzQC json #57)
• added description from ([CV] description broken for "MS2 density per quantile" #63)

[bittremieux]

As for the question in point 3, I think the size of tables and matrices should similarly be defined implicitly.

Do we need to have the unit ontology obo in this repository as well? We're not maintaining it, so it'll get out of date. Why not rather keep it at its original location and refer to it there?

[dtabb73]

Hi, folks. As I understood it, we should have a CV 0.1.1 for me to use in updating my QuaMeter IDFree example. Is there a reason this pull request hasn't been integrated?

[mwalzer]

@dtabb73: Wout raised at least one point we should consider (regarding the uo.obo) and the other one I try to make sense of. @bittremieux which question in point 3 are you referring to? In fact, which point 3 - #63?

[mwalzer]

@julianu : I agree with @bittremieux on the uo.obo matter. There would be two solutions for a link if you need it in the MzQC structure (and I also see that it would be useful to have that one available, too, when you check out a local copy of MzQC):

• submodules
• subtree

[mwalzer]

@julianu was this the origin of the uo.obo?

[bittremieux]

@mwalzer The question in parentheses in point 3 in the readme.

[mwalzer]

PR moved here: #67
Further discussion there. You can also commit to that branch.