The is a fork of https://github.com/creachadair/jrpc2.
We added several small changes into the original implementation in order to allow to OVNDB clients, which use jrpcv1
protocol to communicate with this jrpcv2 server.
These proprietary changes have the OVSDB
comment tag.
This repository provides Go package that implements a JSON-RPC 2.0 client and server. There is also a working example in the Go playground.
-
Package jrpc2 implements the base client and server.
-
Package channel defines the communication channel abstraction used by the server & client.
-
Package code defines standard error codes as defined by the JSON-RPC 2.0 protocol.
-
Package handler defines support for adapting functions to service methods.
-
Package jctx implements an encoder and decoder for request context values, allowing context metadata to be propagated through JSON-RPC requests.
-
Package jhttp allows clients and servers to use HTTP as a transport.
-
Package metrics defines a server metrics collector.
-
Package server provides support for running a server to handle multiple connections, and an in-memory implementation for testing.
The following describes some of the implementation choices made by this module.
The JSON-RPC 2.0 spec is ambiguous about the semantics of batch requests. Specifically, the definition of notifications says:
A Notification is a Request object without an "id" member. ... The Server MUST NOT reply to a Notification, including those that are within a batch request.
Notifications are not confirmable by definition, since they do not have a Response object to be returned. As such, the Client would not be aware of any errors (like e.g. "Invalid params", "Internal error").
This conflicts with the definition of batch requests, which asserts:
A Response object SHOULD exist for each Request object, except that there SHOULD NOT be any Response objects for notifications. ... The Response objects being returned from a batch call MAY be returned in any order within the Array. ... If the batch rpc call itself fails to be recognized as an valid JSON or as an Array with at least one value, the response from the Server MUST be a single Response object.
and includes examples that contain request values with no ID (which are, perforce, notifications) and report errors back to the client. Since order may not be relied upon, and there are no IDs, the client cannot correctly match such responses back to their originating requests.
This implementation resolves the conflict in favour of the notification rules. Specifically:
-
If a batch is empty or not valid JSON, the server reports error -32700 (Invalid JSON) as a single error Response object.
-
Otherwise, parse or validation errors resulting from any batch member without an ID are mapped to error objects with a
null
ID, in the same position in the reply as the corresponding request. Preservation of order is not required by the specification, but it ensures the server has stable behaviour.
Because a server is allowed to reorder the results, a client should not depend on this implementation detail.
The specification defines client and server as follows:
The Client is defined as the origin of
Request
objects and the handler ofResponse
objects. The Server is defined as the origin ofResponse
objects and the handler ofRequest
objects.
Although a client may also be a server, and vice versa, the specification does not require them to do so. The server notification support defined in the jrpc2
package is thus "non-standard" in that it allows the server to act as a client, and the client as a server, in the narrow context of "push" notifications and server callbacks. Otherwise the feature is not special: Requests sent by *jrpc2.Server.Notify
and *jrpc2.Server.Callback
are standard Request
objects.