Fix nlopt optimization test by ignoring it

[yannikschaelte]

One of the algorithms (GD_STOGO_RAND, id 9) failed in like 40% of the cases with a non-finite return value. Therefore ignoring. Needs to be investigated if someone wants to use that exact algorithm.

[jvanhoefer]

a) do you want to push into master or into develop?
b) do you see this as a short term or long term solution?

[yannikschaelte]

Thanks, develop should have been the target. I see it as a solution until someone complains, bc probably that specific optimizer is just not too robust.

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #559 (df39a8c) into develop (53a1e1b) will decrease coverage by 0.22%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #559      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    89.73%   89.51%   -0.23%     
===========================================
  Files           71       71              
  Lines         4532     4532              
===========================================
- Hits          4067     4057      -10     
- Misses         465      475      +10     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pypesto/objective/amici_util.py	75.89% <0.00%> (-8.93%)	⬇️
pypesto/objective/amici_calculator.py	91.66% <0.00%> (-1.67%)	⬇️
pypesto/optimize/optimizer.py	90.61% <0.00%> (+0.26%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 53a1e1b...df39a8c. Read the comment docs.