You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It turns out the new SNC Patient report format from 2020 isn't completely consistent. I just came across a report that only had one column in the dose comparison block with one extra row, so all of the data in the "Summary" block was shifted by one row. This was for an SRS mapcheck, maybe it's the case for all of those?
I think the solution is to add "Meas Uncertainty" in the identifiers for now. If we find more report issues, might just have to move away from the JSON template method.
You can quickly identify these reports by filtering your report output by Summary Type, which ends up being "Yes" or "No" (the answer for Use Global).
My SRS mapcheck example
ArcCheck
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It turns out the new SNC Patient report format from 2020 isn't completely consistent. I just came across a report that only had one column in the dose comparison block with one extra row, so all of the data in the "Summary" block was shifted by one row. This was for an SRS mapcheck, maybe it's the case for all of those?
I think the solution is to add "Meas Uncertainty" in the identifiers for now. If we find more report issues, might just have to move away from the JSON template method.
You can quickly identify these reports by filtering your report output by Summary Type, which ends up being "Yes" or "No" (the answer for Use Global).
My SRS mapcheck example
ArcCheck
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: