Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clean up MetaProgrammingLibrary, mpl:: namespace #2713

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2021
Merged

Clean up MetaProgrammingLibrary, mpl:: namespace #2713

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2021

Conversation

dzenanz
Copy link
Member

@dzenanz dzenanz commented Sep 4, 2021

No description provided.

@github-actions github-actions bot added area:Core Issues affecting the Core module type:Documentation Documentation improvement or change area:Python wrapping Python bindings for a class area:ThirdParty Issues affecting the ThirdParty module type:Infrastructure Infrastructure/ecosystem related changes, such as CMake or buildbots type:Testing Ensure that the purpose of a class is met/the results on a wide set of test cases are correct labels Sep 4, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the area:IO Issues affecting the IO module label Sep 7, 2021
@dzenanz dzenanz marked this pull request as ready for review September 8, 2021 20:19
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the area:ThirdParty Issues affecting the ThirdParty module label Sep 8, 2021
N-Dekker
N-Dekker approved these changes Sep 8, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@N-Dekker N-Dekker left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 👍

@dzenanz
Copy link
Member Author

dzenanz commented Sep 9, 2021

/azp run ITK.macOS

@dzenanz
Copy link
Member Author

dzenanz commented Sep 9, 2021

There was one failing test, the flaky itkStatisticsUniqueLabelMapFilterTest1.

@dzenanz dzenanz merged commit 9f3a624 into InsightSoftwareConsortium:master Sep 9, 2021
@dzenanz dzenanz deleted the cmake320policies branch September 9, 2021 15:57
@dzenanz dzenanz mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2022
Merged
phcerdan added a commit to phcerdan/ITKIsotropicWavelets that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2022
@phcerdan
ENH: Use std::enable_if instead of itk::EnableIf
e4b210e 
itk::EnableIf was marked as legacy in [itk 5.3](InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#2713)
@phcerdan phcerdan mentioned this pull request Jun 3, 2022
Merged
phcerdan added a commit to phcerdan/ITKIsotropicWavelets that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2022
@phcerdan
ENH: Use std::enable_if instead of itk::EnableIf
0a15890 
itk::EnableIf was marked as legacy in [itk 5.3](InsightSoftwareConsortium/ITK#2713)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@N-Dekker N-Dekker N-Dekker approved these changes

@hjmjohnson hjmjohnson hjmjohnson approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area:Core Issues affecting the Core module area:IO Issues affecting the IO module area:Python wrapping Python bindings for a class type:Documentation Documentation improvement or change type:Infrastructure Infrastructure/ecosystem related changes, such as CMake or buildbots type:Testing Ensure that the purpose of a class is met/the results on a wide set of test cases are correct
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@dzenanz @hjmjohnson @N-Dekker