We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sometimes it's suggested that impls could have names, such that they have to be explicitly imported by name before they have any effect.
impl
This is not a viable solution for orphan rule conflicts because it's unsound unless it's pure sugar, but that's not at all obvious to most people so it's worth noting that explicitly. In fact, Rust used to have named impls but removed them long before 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Sometimes it's suggested that
impls could have names, such that they have to be explicitly imported by name before they have any effect.This is not a viable solution for orphan rule conflicts because it's unsound unless it's pure sugar, but that's not at all obvious to most people so it's worth noting that explicitly. In fact, Rust used to have named impls but removed them long before 1.0.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: