-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PyOpenSci Review - Code Updates #155
Conversation
- clarified in the README that this is only intended for regression (we should add an equivalent for classification, with different default metrics, that would perhaps involve creating a new abstract function that both this function and the new one would call) - make more general by allowing users to pass in other metrics, or to include their own
I have gone through the commits and the issues/concerns they address and I believe you have addressed and explained everything well. I have no additional concerns on the code or functionality. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have gone through the changes and the issues they address and I believe you have addressed all the major concerns.
3.12 support blocked by RDKit for the time being, will bypass: |
9fdbb23
to
132f6b3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Test coverage meets or exceeds 90% threshold (currently 97%).
This pull request contains updates to the source code as part of the PyOpenSci review (see pyOpenSci/software-submission#120).
Each commit message contains additional clarifying details.