Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Right-hand side" needs to be hyphenated #3296

Closed
samm82 opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3379
Closed

"Right-hand side" needs to be hyphenated #3296

samm82 opened this issue Feb 23, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #3379
Assignees
Labels
newcomers Good first issue to work on! question stable-fix

Comments

@samm82
Copy link
Collaborator

samm82 commented Feb 23, 2023

The full version of "RHS" is "right-hand side", with a hyphen (source), and likewise for "LHS" (if used).
image

Note that the capitalization should then be "Right-Hand Side", since "right" is a word on its own (source).

Also note that this along with #3380 and #3381 are specific to SWHS but could come up in other examples as well.

@samm82 samm82 added question stable-fix newcomers Good first issue to work on! labels Feb 23, 2023
@smiths
Copy link
Collaborator

smiths commented Feb 24, 2023

Thanks @samm82. I like how picky you are! Since our goal is to say everything once (and generate all other instances) we should make every effort to say things as best we can. The acronym RHS is pretty common, so I think it is a good idea to use it. Even if it isn't used much in SWHS, it will be used in other examples.

@hrzhuang hrzhuang self-assigned this May 5, 2023
@hrzhuang hrzhuang changed the title Issues with "RHS" "Right-hand side" needs to be hyphenated May 5, 2023
@balacij balacij linked a pull request May 6, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
newcomers Good first issue to work on! question stable-fix
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants